-
Re: Diversifying TypeDrawers
Yes, there is. It's giving a marginalized person the benefit of the doubt that they understand their marginalization better than you do. And if someone tells you it's racist that they have to stand i…6 -
Re: Diversifying TypeDrawers
We are answering all of your questions, you're just disagreeing with the answers. Are women being discriminated against? Yes! And if TypeDrawers isn't the place to argue over semantics then I don't k…11 -
Re: Diversifying TypeDrawers
Okay, well I think we're trying to do that. The assumption—no, the insistence—that white men's opinions need an equal (and let's face it, a majority, as you're still the majority on this and most oth…4 -
Re: Diversifying TypeDrawers
Being in an industry where men look categorically like nice guys would be a great start. As we've seen, that is not the case. I think we have more than addressed what the problems are, Dyana's articl…4 -
Re: Diversifying TypeDrawers
The major thing I keep noticing here (and elsewhere) is the assumption that by 'men' we mean 'you, individually.' Individuals can have great intentions, are kind people, good husbands, respectful, et…13